Naome Kabanda, Acting Assistant Commissioner of the Land Inspectorate Division, Department of Land Administration, Uganda Ministry of Lands, Housing and Urban Development.

Naome Kabanda    Credit: Deborah Espinosa.  

By Naome Kabanda, Acting Assistant Commissioner of the Land Inspectorate Division, Department of Land Administration, Uganda Ministry of Lands, Housing and Urban Development.

In an economy such as ours, where almost 80% of the population's economic activity is in agriculture and land, policy and regulation on these two should not be burdensome: the system in regard to procedures and processes to acquire a land title and credit should be less costly, nearer to the people, rather transparent, efficient, and should be implemented in a simple, consistent way regardless of connections, political affiliation, one's education, or whether man or woman.

Uganda's legal system cannot be completely delineated from the British legal system from which it was adopted. Post-colonial efforts to amend and enact new laws did not yield much and hence to date many colonial-era laws are still  on our books and form the bulk of the policies and practice guidelines in our legal system for transacting in land and property rights.  In the formal courts, the system of administering justice as applied is dualistic in nature (formal law is applied side-by-side with  customary law) and where there is no written law, the common law of England is cited as the law of general application.

Reforming property laws in Uganda has been on government agendas since the seventies. Uganda's Land Act 1998 was the first new law which attempted to bring major reforms in the land sector. This law came into force almost three years after the passing of the new Constitution in 1995. But it was not backed by any policy framework, making its implementation complex; some of the major provisions have never been implemented while other provisions face many challenges as society has not accepted them.

Subsequent amendments to the Land Act 1998 (in 2001, 2004 and 2010) clearly  demonstrated that the law was unacceptable in many ways, highlighting its internal weaknesses on one side, but also demonstrating that Uganda needed a National Land Policy to guide principles for the management, administration and use of Uganda's land resources.

Uganda's National Land Policy

Uganda’s National Land Policy was approved in February 2013 by Cabinet as the framework for development and use of Uganda’s land resources for the next decade. The Policy has two major objectives: (1) to re-orient the land sector in national development by articulating management co-ordination between the land sector and other productive sectors in the economy; and (2) enhancing the contribution of the land sector to the social and economic development of the country.

The key issues outlined in the policy include:

  • The creation of a customary register to facilitate registration of customary rights;
  • Strengthening women's land rights through enactment of provisions promoting the regime of marital property law and joint ownership of  land and property for married parties;
  • The   need  to  overhaul the existing institutional framework for land administration and land management through decentralisation of land services by bringing  land services  nearer to the populace to make them more efficient, cost-effective and accessible;
  • The re-institution of administrative Land Tribunals to handle escalating land conflicts and land evictions; and
  • The legal recognition of the dual operation of both customary system and statutory system in land rights administration, land dispute resolution and land management by empowering customary authorities to perform their functions.

Successful implementation of the national land policy will depend on continuing buy-in, support and confidence of all stakeholders. Stakeholders must participate and be constructively engaged at all levels of policy implementation. These include different government departments, development partners, the private sector, civil society organizations, professional bodies, cultural institutions, faith-based organizations and other non-state actors. 

Among the key preliminary steps for implementing of the policy will be: 

  • Putting in place a secretariat and a multi-sectoral and multi-disciplinary committee to lead the implementation of the National Land Policy;
  • Preparation of an Action Implementation Plan  as a program of land reform with  activities sequenced to include short term, medium and long term;
  • Costing the reforms and packaging them as programs for stakeholders to  choose which programs they would prefer to implement;
  • Developing a plan of action/strategy for fundraising for the programs;
  • Setting a time frame for review of laws relating to land, as well drafting the proposed new laws;
  • Developing indicators for monitoring and measuring program implementation;
  • Designing and strengthening structures for coordination of implementation; and
  • Defining roles of the different stakeholders, including development partners: CSOs, NGOs, Academia, Researchers, and other non-state actors.

Learning from Experience

Land reform in Africa is not like baking a cake where you follow the same recipe - we are all different and face different challenges in the proper management of land and natural resources. But we can take certain things from each other’s experiences, certain key lessons, and apply these lessons and see how they work in our own environment.

Uganda is the last country in the East African region to write its National Land Policy, after Kenya, Rwanda, and Tanzania. This will not only allow her to learn from best practices in the region, but also give the country the advantage of tapping into the rich resources around Africa for support and input from others who have experience with land rights reforms in other countries, to help strengthen implementation of the National Land Policy in Uganda.  

Comment on this page

Comments are moderated before publication

Comments submitted for this page

  • Silvania (4th December 2013)

    This had a big impact on me in high scohol when my world history teacher had us watch it as a class. My teacher had us promise not to talk about things that happened in the class while watching the movie. What I can say is that no one was tearless. We all understood that what is happening in Uganda is wrong and needed to stop. We decided to join the invisible children club and have pen pals with kids in or near Uganda. My friends name was Derek and we mailed each other for quite a while until one of the kid soldiers took him from his mother and killed her. I only know this because a scohol girl wrote back to my last letter to him. I always think about what I could do to help and if he is ok. I haven't gotten anything back so that means Kony still has him or he was killed for not listening to orders. The government doesn't realize that Kony is another Adolf Hitler. He needs to be stopped so that African children can be safe. I really don't like knowing that Derek could be alive and doing what someone did to him. I can just imagine how bad he is feeling. I join the 2012 movement to help bring notice to this problem but yet the government still just sits back. Sure Jason went crazy but that doesn't mean that these kids don't need us.